18 June 2011

Runaway Bride: Crystal Harris


The 25-year-old blonde almost went from "Girl Next Door" to Mrs. Hefner on June 18, but just five days before the planned nuptials, she dumped the dude.

But not before she shot an entire cover and pictorial as Mrs. Crystal Hefner!

Click for two versions of the cover, and some SFW shots of the almost-bride.



New Playboy Cover?

After Hugh Hefner was left at the alter, he tweeted this revision.

"Recent events call for a special sticker on the July cover," he wrote. "Look for it on newsstands."

Playboy subscribers, however, won't see a sticker on their copies since they have already been mailed out.



Sexy Shoot

Do you think Crystal will ever get a spread like this in Playboy again?

Click for more pics of Crystal and Hefner in happier times.


Crystal with Hef

Crystal shows off her engagement ring that Hef gave her on Dec. 24, 2010.


In Happier Times

April 28: The Playboy mogul, 85 had said that he would not make Crystal sign a pre-nuptial agreement because "he actually cares about his blonde fiance."


The Happy Couple

May 25, 2010: The engaged couple pose at The Palms in Las Vegas.


The 'Girls Next Door'

Dec. 14, 2009: Crystal with her co-stars, Kristina and Karissa Shannon at Millions of Milkshakes.


Crystal Harris

Dec. 14, 2009: Crystal makes her own milkshake at Millions of Milkshakes.

Blake Lively Knocks Kim Kardashian from Site's Top Spot

Beach Babe Blake Lively

The starlet goes from 'Gossip Girl' to surfer girl in the June issue of 'Vogue.'


VOGUE’s June issue features American golden girl, Blake Lively. Photographed by Mario Testino, Ms. Lively shines in sporty, sexy beachwear and gets schooled by surf legend Rob Machado on the finer points of wave-catching and breeze-shooting on Moonlight Beach.


Blake reveals a body toned for her upcoming role as Carol Ferris (a.k.a. ultravillain Star Sapphire) in the upcoming superhero flick "Green Lantern."

"All I want is to be a hero to my nephews and nieces," Lively says, laughing. "I'm going to be the coolest aunt ever."








Kissing in Time of Riots: Mystery Couple in Lip Lock as Vancouver Burns

Kissing or injured? 

Kissing or injured?: Lying in the street and locked in a kiss amidst chaos around them, a young couple appear oblivious to the raging crowds and baton-wielding riot police. Vancouver broke out in riots after their hockey team the Vancouver Canucks lost in Game Seven of the Stanley Cup Finals.

 

Image is uncropped and out of focus. Photo four of five, in sequence. A couple lies on a street as an unidentified woman approaches on June 15, 2011 in Vancouver, Canada.
The couple was later identified as Alex Thomas, a Canadian student at University of Guelph, Ontario and her boyfriend Scott Jones, who is from Australia. (Photo by Rich Lam/Getty Images)

 

Riot police walk in the street as a couple kisses on June 15, 2011 in Vancouver, Canada. (Photo by Rich Lam/Getty Images)

 

Image is uncropped. Photo five of five, in sequence. A couple lies on a street as an unidentified woman approaches on June 15, 2011 in Vancouver, Canada. (Photo by Rich Lam/Getty Images)

 

Canada-based photojournalist Richard Lam took the photograph while covering the riots that followed the Vancouver Canucks' 4-0 loss to the Boston Bruins in the Stanley Cup.

 

Riot police walk in the street as a couple kiss on June 15, 2011 in Vancouver, Canada. Vancouver broke out in riots after their hockey team the Vancouver Canucks lost in Game Seven of the Stanley Cup Finals. (Photo by Rich Lam/Getty Images)

 

Riot police walk in the street as a couple kiss on June 15, 2011 in Vancouver, Canada. Vancouver broke out in riots after their hockey team the Vancouver Canucks lost in Game Seven of the Stanley Cup Finals. (Photo by Rich Lam/Getty Images)

 

A person walks in front of a burning vehicle on June 15, 2011 in Vancouver, Canada. Vancouver broke out in riots after their hockey team the Vancouver Canucks lost in Game Seven of the Stanley Cup Finals. (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

 

Riot police stand in front of a burning vehicle on June 15, 2011 in Vancouver, Canada. (Photo by Rich Lam/Getty Images)

Meet Yana Lapikova, Vladimir Putin's Hot Personal Photographer

HotShot 

HotShot: Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has appointed a glamorous former model as his 'personal photographer', triggering a flurry of comments why she was hired.

25-year-old ex-model Yana Lapikova, who contested for the Miss Moscow title in 2008, would work as an intern for Putin's two photographers and may eventually become a full-timer, Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed.

 

"She is really a good photographer, and her modelling past is of no interest to us whatsoever because it's not a crime," Peskov was quoted as saying by RIA-Novosti. (AP Photo)

 

Peskov said the two regular photographers are "squeezed dry" by their exhaustive schedule, which he compared to "penal servitude."

 

But he said that finding one more photographer was hard because government pay is no match for salaries at news agencies. (AP Photo/Gleb Shchelkunov)

A photograph shot by Yana Lapikova 

A photograph shot by Yana Lapikova: In an interview to Biznes (Business) FM radio, Yana said she was employed by Izvestia daily and currently is on leave before taking up the new job. (AP Photo/RIA Novosti, Yana Lapikova)

 

Samples of her work, include scantily-clad photographs of glamorous models, cats and birthday cakes, have drawn scathing comments over her appointment.

 

In the interview to the radio, Yana claimed that she has already worked in the Kremlin pool, covering President Dmitry Medvedev.

Strip For Free Clothes!

 

People in their underwear queue in the rain outside a Desigual fashion store for the 'Arrive Half-Naked, Leave Fully Dressed' offer, in central London, on June 16, 2011. Desigual gave away a free outfit to the first hundred individuals who arrived at their Regent street store in London, dressed in just their underwear. AFP PHOTO / KI PRICE

 

People in their underwear queue up to be let in for the summer sale at a Desigual fashion store in Berlin on June 16, 2011. The first hundred customers to turn up semi-naked were offered the chance to leave the store fully dressed for free in an attempt by the chain to draw attention and people to their summer sale in their premier shop in Berlin's Tauentzienstrasse. AFP PHOTO / ODD ANDERSEN

 

Young women in their underwear try on clothes and shop in a Desigual fashion store during a marketing campaign for their summer sale in Berlin on June 16, 2011. The first hundred customers to turn up semi-naked were offered the chance to leave the store fully dressed for free in an attempt by the chain to draw attention and people to their summer sale in their premier shop in Berlin's Tauentzienstrasse. AFP PHOTO / ODD ANDERSEN

 

People in their underwear crowd a Desigual fashion store during a marketing campaign for the summer sale in Berlin on June 16, 2011. The first hundred customers to turn up semi-naked were offered the chance to leave the store fully dressed for free in an attempt by the chain to draw attention and people to their summer sale in their premier shop in Berlin's Tauentzienstrasse. AFP PHOTO / ODD ANDERSEN

 

A woman in her underwear and scarf worn as a niqab, queues outside a Desigual fashion store for the 'Arrive Half-Naked, Leave Fully Dressed' offer, in central London, on June 16, 2011. Desigual gave away a free outfit to the first hundred individuals who arrived at their Regent street store in London, dressed in just their underwear. AFP PHOTO / KI PRICE

 

A customer in her underwear chooses clothes inside a Desigual fashion store during the 'Arrive Half-Naked, Leave Fully Dressed' offer, in central London, on June 16, 2011. Desigual gave away a free outfit to the first hundred individuals who arrived at their Regent street store in London, dressed in just their underwear. AFP PHOTO / KI PRICE

 

Customers in their underwear choose clothes inside a Desigual fashion store during the 'Arrive Half-Naked, Leave Fully Dressed' offer, in central London, on June 16, 2011. Desigual gave away a free outfit to the first hundred individuals who arrived at their Regent street store in London, dressed in just their underwear. AFP PHOTO / KI PRICE

 

Young women in their underwear is seen in a mirror trying a pair of jeans in a Desigual fashion store during a marketing campaign for their summer sale in Berlin on June 16, 2011. The first hundred customers to turn up semi-naked were offered the chance to leave the store fully dressed for free in an attempt by the chain to draw attention and people to their summer sale in their premier shop in Berlin's Tauentzienstrasse. AFP PHOTO / ODD ANDERSEN

UN's Offer To Taliban

UN splits Al-Qaeda and Taliban on sanctions list

UN_FlagUnited Nations, Jun 18  : The UN Security Council on Friday split the international sanctions regime for the Taliban and Al-Qaeda to encourage the Taliban to join reconciliation efforts in Afghanistan.

The council unanimously passed two resolutions which set up one new blacklist of individuals and organizations accused of links to Al-Qaeda and a second for those linked to the Taliban militia.

The two groups have until now been handled by the same sanctions committee. But the international powers wanted to separate them to highlight the divide between Al-Qaeda's global jihadist agenda and the Taliban's focus on Afghanistan.

The sanctions committee was set up in 1999 when Al-Qaeda had major bases in the Taliban, which ruled Afghanistan until they were driven out of power by US led forces.

The new resolutions, 1988 and 1989, send "a clear message to the Taliban that there is a future for those who separate from Al-Qaeda, renounce violence and abide by the Afghan constitution," said Susan Rice, UN envoy for the United States, which led the campaign for the division.

Peter Wittig, Germany's UN ambassador who heads the Security Council anti-terrorism sanctions committee, said the resolution sends "a strong signal of trust and support for the peace and reconciliation efforts of the government of Afghanistan."

US President Barack Obama has set July as the target date to start cutting the 100,000 American troops in Afghanistan and Defense Secretary Robert Gates said this month there could be talks with the Taliban before the end of the year.

The new sanctions regime for those who pose "a threat to the peace, stability and security of Afghanistan" gives the Afghan government a say in the listing and delisting of accused militants. An ombudsman also gets extra powers to recommend delistings.

The Security Council will have to vote unanimously to keep a person on a sanctions list if the ombudsman has recommended the name be taken off.

Wittig called the changes a "major advance."

While all 15 council measures backed the resolutions, India and Russia said there must be non easing up in the international fight against terrorism. "There must be no slackening of efforts to fight both Al-Qaeda and the Taliban," said Russian ambassador Vitaly Churkin.

Separately, the Security Council's sanctions committee is considering taking about 20 former Taliban commanders off the UN blacklist.

The Afghan government had originally advanced about 50 names but withdrew many because it did not have the paperwork to back up the case, diplomats said. A decision on those still waiting will be taken in mid-July.

The remaining list includes five members of Afghan President Hamid Karzai's Higher Council of Peace, which he set up last year to seek peace talks with Afghanistan's former hardline rulers.

One of them, Mohammed Qalamuddin, was once head of the Taliban's feared religious police.

There are 135 Taliban names facing sanctions. The 254 long Al-Qaeda list was cut by two this week following recommendations from an ombudsman.

One Sudanese-Canadian, Abousfian Abdelrazik, 49, went to the Security Council with a delegation of Canadian civic and labor groups in a bid to get his name taken off the Al-Qaeda list.

Abdelrazik has been on the UN list since 2006 and subject to an asset freeze and travel ban. Detained after travelling to Khartoum on what he said was a trip to see his ailing mother in 2003, he has denied any links to Al-Qaeda.

"Since my name has been on that list no one has given me any evidence about what I am supposed to have done wrong," he said after meeting sanctions committee officials in New York.

Finally, Supreme Court of India Takes Notice on AFSPA

By Priyanuj Gohain

indian-army-rape

New Delhi, Jun 18
: Finally the Supreme Court of India is seemed to have taken some notice of the controversial and inhuman Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) applicable in the North East of India. Citing an example where the centre took different stances between allegations of fake encounter in Jammu & Kashmir and Assam, the Supreme Court bench questioned yesterday, June 16, 2011 as ‘How can you adopt diametrically different views?’ In the example used, the centre sought prosecution of the Rashtriya Rifles personnel for killing seven youth at a fake encounter at Chattisingpora, Jammu & Kashmir in 2004. On the other hand, the centre was found claiming that the army men accused of a similar fake encounter in Assam enjoyed immunity since they were under the powers of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA).

The Supreme Court asked the Government to confirm two issues:

  1. Whether the Army/Para military personnel can enjoy immunity from criminal prosecution for any penal offence committed in discharge of their official duties, including fake encounters and rapes under provision of the AFSPA.
  2. If an investigating agency like CBI conduct a preliminary inquiry into such accuses of rapes or killings before registering an FIR against accused Army/ Para military personnel

It is to be mentioned that The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) is one of the more draconian legislations that the Indian Parliament has passed and is implemented only in the North East States of India. Under this Act, all security forces are given unrestricted and unaccounted power to carry out their operations, once an area is declared disturbed. Even a non-commissioned officer is granted the right to shoot to kill or arrest anyone without a warrant based on mere suspicion. This inhuman law which dignifies the basic human rights has been long protested by the people of the region; however the long cries and protests have never succeeded in making the centre realize the need to consider citizens of the North East states as human beings who needed same rights as fellow countrymen.

It was first applied to the North Eastern states of Assam and Manipur and was amended to extend to all the seven states in the north- eastern region of India.

A few of the brutal points about the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA):

Why AFSPA is draconian and unconstitutional

  • Section 3 of the AFSPA grants the power to declare an area disturbed to the Central Government and the Governor of the State, but does not describe the circumstances under which the authority would be justified in making such a declaration! This decision depends on the satisfaction level of the government and can not be judicially challenged, even if the state government does not agree. In fact the fact that North Eastern states always had an ex-military general as its Governor proves the parallel colonialism style Government which the centre tried to maintain with the use of the AFSPA.
  • Under section 4, the army men are allowed to shoot to kill and the only requirement is the opinion of the army personnel! The army is also given the power to destroy property, arrest anyone and take to custody for as long as wanted. Needless to mention such powers have resulted in all the wrong results in the North East with the army accused of innumerable rapes, fake killings and tortures to thousands of innocent individuals.
  • Section 6 of the AFSPA provides the Army with absolute immunity for all atrocities committed under the AFSPA. A person wishing to file suit against a member of the armed forces for abuses must first seek the permission of the Central Government! This AFSPA suspends the Constitutional right to take legal action.

irom4

AFSPA violates all International law

The AFSPA, by its form and in its application, violates the:

  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The following sections of this declaration is violated by the AFSPA: 1 – Free and Equal Dignity and rights, 2 – Non- discrimination, 3 – Life, liberty, security of person, 5 – no torture, 7 – equality before the law, 8 – effective remedy, 9 – no arbitrary arrest, 17 – property.
  • The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (the ICCPR)
  • The Convention Against Torture, the UN Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials
  • The UN Body of Principles for Protection of All Persons Under any form of Detention
  • UN Principles on Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra- legal and summary executions.

Why this injustice and inhuman attitude to North-East alone

A law similar to AFSPA was once used by the British Army in Northern Ireland when they  carried out arrests under the Northern Ireland (Emergency Provisions) Act or the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act. Under this law, the detainees were held for seven days without charge. However the European Court of Human Rights found this to be in violation of the Human Rights Covenant and had abolished this law.

In India, however the Delhi high court had found the AFSPA to be legal and constitutional when it was challenged. When India had presented its periodic report to the United Nations Human Rights committee in 1991, Members of the UN challenged the validity of the AFSPA, questioning how the AFSPA could be deemed constitutional under Indian law. The Attorney General of India however only argued that the AFSPA is necessary to prevent the secession of the North Eastern states. This had made the stand of the Indian Government quite clear that it is not exactly concerned about safeguarding lives and interests of the people of this region but only to rule and exploit it.

Indian has recent rise in armed conflicts in all Maoist affected zones, where the magnitude of terror is found to be more than what it is in North East. However, Indian Government has neither deployed the army (Stating that Maoists are the citizens of India and Army should not fight their own citizens) nor declared the areas as disturbed to enact the AFSPA into those areas.

The matter of AFSPA and the right to human life for the people of North East seems to be in the hands of the Supreme Court of India. Is this the last hope for a right to live and dignity for this region? Only time will tell.