19 March 2011

Economic Freedom: India's Top 20 States

Sinlung Observer: Looking at the Economic Freedom of the States of India, it looks like wither Northeast India with exception to Assam don't even belong to India. With Mizoram and Goa figuring in very good figures of Per Capita Income and Spending.

Let me stop cribbing and go through the report yourself to see the regional imbalance…Bias against Northeast India.


The Indian flag flutters as Indian Air Force jets fly by.

With India benefiting from sustained high growth as a result of liberal reforms, it is important to measure the diverse levels of economic freedom in various Indian states.

The report on the Economic Freedom of the States of India is the latest in a series of annual surveys on the economic freedom of Indian states, which started in 2004. The latest report takes 2009 as the period under review.

The index of economic freedom devised for this series 'is derived from the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World report, with adjustments for data relevant to subnational entities, and whose design benefited from critical input from the Fraser Institute and the authors of the Economic Freedom of the World report'.

The report has been authored by noted economist Bibek Debroy, Laveesh Bhandari of research firm Indicus Analyctis, and columnist Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar.

More economic freedom means greater wealth, higher growth, and improvement in a range of human development indicators, says the authors of the report.

The uneven levels of economic freedom in India can be a major indicator to state-level policymakers that much needs to be done to improve the welfare of citizens.

The report has been co-published by the Washington-based think tank Cato Institute, leading Indian economics research firm Indicus Analytics, and the non-profit organisation Friedrich Naumann Foundation.

Bharatanatyam dancers in Chennai.

1. Tamil Nadu
Overall average: 0.593
Rank in 2005: 1

The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam may be hogging headlines for giving headaches to the United Progressive Alliance government at the Centre, but when it comes to governing Tamil Nadu, DMK scored highest so far as economic freedom is concerned.

Tamil Nadu retained the top slot in a ranking of 20 states from 2005 to 2009.

In legal structure and security of property rights, the top three states in 2009 are Tamil Nadu, Madhya Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh and the bottom three are Bihar, West Bengal and Assam.

Girls performing the garba dance in Ahmedabad.

2. Gujarat
Overall average: 0.574
Rank in 2005: 5

The Narendra Modi-led government in Gujarat may be accused of many counts on political freedom, but the state progressed from 5th position in 2005 to 2nd in 2009.

The Charminar in Hyderabad.

3. Andhra Pradesh
Overall average: 0.509
Rank in 2005: 7

After former Andhra chief minister YSR Reddy's death, Andhra Pradesh might take time to see emergence of an equally tall leader and the political landscape there may have been marred by the movement for Telangana.

However, the state moved fastest in the ranking of the Economic Freedom of the States of India over the period under review. The state occupied third position in 2009 against seventh in 2005.

Its index score went up from 0.40 to 0.51 on a scale from 0 to 1, an improvement of 27.75 per cent.

However, Andhra Pradesh's ranking in the index next time may be interesting to watch since Reddy died in September 2009, leaving only a quarter of the year for the successor.

Haryana

4. Haryana
Overall average: 0.473
Rank in 2005: 4

Haryana has maintained its rank on economic freedom at no. 4 in 2009 too.

Himachal Pradesh.

5. Himachal Pradesh
Overall average: 0.428
Rank in 2005: 3

Himachal, which was ranked no. 3 in terms of economic freedom in 2005, slipped two levels to no. 5 in 2009.

Madhya Pradesh

6. Madhya Pradesh
Overall average: 0.417
Rank in 2005: 2

For Madhya Pradesh, the slide was steeper as it slipped from the second (in 2005) to the sixth spot in 2009.

Jaipur.

7. Rajasthan
Overall average: 0.401
Rank in 2005: 12

Rajasthan showed significant progress to jump up the rankings table, from no. 12 rank in 2005 to no. 7 rank in 2009.

A farmer in Ranchi, Jharkhand.

8. Jharkhand
Overall average: 0.384
Rank in 2005: 8

As regards size of government, the top three states in 2009 are Gujarat, Jharkhand and Haryana.

The bottom three are Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttar Pradesh, in reverse order.

Jharkhand may seem to be a bit of a surprise, but the point is that the state witnessed high economic growth without a concomitant increase in the size of the government.

Kashmiris sitting by the Dal Lake on a shikara.

9. Jammu and Kashmir
Overall average: 0.379
Rank in 2005: 15

The troubled state of Jammu and Kashmir showed excellent improvement, jumping from the 15th spot in 2005 to the 9th in 2009.

A dancer readies for his performance in Kochi.

10. Kerala
Overall average: 0.358
Rank in 2005: 10

Kerala, Bihar, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Assam and Chhattisgarh showed moderate declines in economic freedom.

Despite that, however, Kerala maintained his no. 10 rank.

The Ganesh festival is celebrated with pomp and gaiety all over Maharashtra.

11. Maharashtra
Overall average: 0.356
Rank in 2005: 9

Maharashtra, known as the financial capital of the country, is still the laggard so far as the index, developed on the lines of the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World report, is concerned. The state further slipped to 11th position from ninth in 2005.

Its record is quite dismal, when seen in the context that once there were efforts to develop Mumbai as an international financial centre.

Punjab.

12. Punjab
Overall average: 0.351
Rank in 2005: 6

The states that dropped in rankings are Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh.

Punjab, once among the best performers, fell from sixth position in 2005 to 12th position in 2009. The report said that Punjab had been riding too long on its earlier successes, and its present track record on governance, broadly defined, was anything but satisfactory.

The Infosys campus in Bengaluru.

13. Karnataka
Overall average: 0.344
Rank in 2005: 13

India's information technology powerhouse, Karnataka too maintained its rank at no. 13, but showed no appreciable increase in economic freedom during the period 2005 to 2009.

The grand Taj Mahal in Agra.

14. Uttar Pradesh
Overall average: 0.340
Rank in 2005: 14

Uttar Pradesh was ranked 14th in 2005 in terms of economic freedom and it continued to remain at the same spot in 2009 too.

A sculptor gives finishing touches to an idol of Goddess Durga in Kolkata.

15. West Bengal
Overall average: 0.329
Rank in 2005: 18

West Bengal jumped 3 spots up on the ranking ladder, from no. 18 in 2005 to no. 15 in 2009.

Chhattisgarh.

16. Chhattisgarh
Overall average: 0.326
Rank in 2005: 16

Chhattisgarh showed little improvement in economic freedom and continued to be ranked 16th in the state index of economic freedom.

The Posco plant in Orissa.

17. Orissa
Overall average: 0.306
Rank in 2005: 11

For Orissa, the slide was very steep as from the 11th spot in 2005 the state slipped to number 17 by 2009.

Security forces in Guwahati.

18. Assam
Overall average: 0.292
Rank in 2005: 19

Assam managed to show some improvement in economic freedom, gaining a spot and moving up from 19th spot in 2005 to 18th in 2009.

Uttarakhand.

19. Uttarakhand
Overall average: 0.260
Rank in 2005: 17

Uttarakhand slipped two spots to 19th in 2009, from 17th in 2005.

Villagers negotiating a flooded river in Bihar.

20. Bihar
Overall average: 0.233
Rank in 2005: 20

Bihar continues to languish at the 20th spot in terms of economic freedom in 2009 too. And this despite the development plank on the basis of the current Nitish Kumar-led government was voted back to power for a new five-year term.

Transparency Watchdog Lauds ONGC's Openness

ONGC is among 44 companies rated by TI.

ONGC, which contributes 77 per cent of India's crude oil production and 81 per cent of natural gas, has been ranked, along with 43 other global oil and gas producers, on its openness by the Transprancy International.

ONGC, a Fortune Global 500 company and one of the highest profit-making corporation in India, has been rated by the watchdog in three specific areas: reporting on anti-corruption programmes, organisational disclosure (disclosure of operations, subsidiaries and partners) and country-level disclosure of financial and technical data.

The findings of the Promoting Revenue Transparency: 2011 Report on Oil and Gas Companies, published by Transparency International in partnership with Revenue Watch, are intended to serve as a benchmark for corporate reporting by the sector.

The report identifies current practices and areas for improvement and provide recommendations for enhancing transparency and accountability in reporting.

ONGC scores low in anti-graft ranking.

Anti-corruption programmes

Transparency International says more and more, oil and gas companies are adopting and making publicly available anti-corruption programmes, the content of which is becoming increasingly similar.

Nevertheless, there are many companies that still do not publish their anti-corruption codes, policies or measures, it said.

BG sits at the top in this section.

More companies should report in detail the features of their anti-corruption programmes, said Transparency International.

ONGC tops national companies in this section.

Organisational disclosure

Public disclosure of partnerships and subsidiaries, including their countries of incorporation, are key elements of organisational disclosure.

The average results in this section are relatively high. ONGC has beaten other national oil companies in this section and is ranked third behind BG and BHP Billiton.

BP is ranked fourth behind ONGC.

Many national oil companies have a good level of disclosure.

Disclosure of equity or field partners in upstream operations, however, remains infrequent, despite the fact that equity minority partnerships often present corruption risks.

The oil major BP is ranked fourth behind ONGC, BHP Billiton and BG in this section.

Statoil tops the list in this section.

Country-level disclosure

Country-level disclosure on international operations has improved since the 2008 PRT report when only a handful of companies published information.

Reporting on production levels has become a broadly accepted standard and there are examples of good disclosure for financial data and reserves.

Nonetheless, in spite of this positive trend, country-level disclosure on international operations remains weak; this type of disclosure received the lowest average score of the three categories covered in the report.

Many companies do not disclose any financial data on a disaggregated country-level. Norwegian oil company Statoil is ranked number one in this section.

PetroChina is at the bottom of the list.

The host country environment itself cannot be exclusively blamed for poor disclosure.

In the same host countries, often described as "difficult environments", some companies disclose extensive information, while the others disclose little or none at all.

PetroChina is at the bottom of the list, while ONGC is ranked behind Petrobras and Statoil.

TI asks companies to be more open.

Key policy recommendations

1. Detailed anti-corruption programmes should be publicly available

2. Companies should undertake voluntary independent assurance of anti-corruption programmes

3. Companies should publish details of their subsidiaries and fields of operations

4. Oil and gas companies should increase their reporting on a country-by-country basis

TI wants standards in accounting.

Transparency International adds these recommendations in its report:

5. Companies should join the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative

6. Companies should create and maintain up-to-date corporate websites

7. All national oil companies should introduce internationally or generally accepted accounting standards, as well as publish independently audited accounts

8. The relationships between home governments and national oil companies should be clear and publicly disclosed

The Hottest Bikini Bodies Under 25!

Megan Fox

Megan Fox

They're young, they're hot and they've got the best bods in the world!

Here's a look at female celebrities under the age of 25 who are always beach-ready, as per a list compiled by website RadarOnline.com

The 24-year-old starlet's latest releases have bombed bigtime at the box office, but she is undeniably a bombshell!

Image: Megan Fox
Photographs: Emporio Armani Underwear ad campaign

 

Lindsay Lohan

Lindsay Lohan

Drama queen Lilo's life has been a trainwreck in recent months, but the same can't be said of her tanned, toned bod.

Image: Lindsay Lohan
Photographs: Cover of Complex Magazine, August 2010

 

Selena Gomez

Selena Gomez

The Disney actress is only 18, but in fantastic form!

Image: Selena Gomez

 

Blake Lively

Blake Lively

The 23-year-old Gossip Girl blonde has great curves.

Image: Blake Lively
Photographs: Cover of Esquire Magazine, February 2010

 

Maria Sharapova

Maria Sharapova

Tennis ace Sharapova's athletic abs and great tone at 23 are enviable for sure!

Image: Maria Sharapova
Photographs: Cover of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Calendar, 2007

 

Olivia Palermo

Olivia Palermo

The American socialite-model-actress just turned 25 last month, but she still qualifies!

Image: Olivia Palermo
Photographs: Mango ad campaign

 

Hayden Panettiere

Hayden Panettiere

Twenty one-year-old Heroes star Hayden is just hot!

Image: Hayden Panettiere
Photographs: Cover of Self Magazine, March 2010

 

Jenni 'JWoww' Farley

Jenni 'JWoww' Farley

The Jersey Shore starlet loves to flaunt her bod in skimpy outfits.

Image: Jenni 'JWoww' Farley
Photographs: Ethan Miller/Getty Images

 

Brooke Hogan

Brooke Hogan

Wrestler Hulk Hogan's baby girl has a killer bod -- must be in her genes!

Image: Brooke Hogan
Photographs: Cover of FHM Magazine, November 2006

 

Hilary Duff

Hilary Duff

Svelte Hilary is already married at 23 -- we're not surprised!

Image: Hilary Duff
Photographs: Cover of Shape Magazine, August 2007

 

Vanessa Hudgens

Vanessa Hudgens

This 22-year-old brunette stunner claims she is addicted to junk food -- doesn't look it, though!

Image: Vanessa Hudgens
Photographs: Cover of Self Magazine, May 2009

 

Rihanna

Rihanna

The Barbadian beauty, 23, is as curvy as they come!

Image: Rihanna
Photographs: Cover of GQ Magazine, January 2010

 

Miley Cyrus

Miley Cyrus

Like Selena, Miley's only 18, but this teen sure looks tantalising!

Image: Miley Cyrus
Photographs: Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images

 

Kristin Cavallari

Kristin Cavallari

The The Hills actress, 24, could have any man climbing mountains for her!

Image: Kristin Cavallari
Photographs: Asos Magazine cover, February 2010

 

Emma Watson

Emma Watson

Now here's a beauty with brains! Style icon Emma is only 20.

Image: Emma Watson
Photographs: Dave Hogan/Getty Images

 

Nina Dobrev

Nina Dobrev

Bulgarian-Canadian actress Nina of The Vampire Diaries fame is in terrific shape.

Image: Nina Dobrev
Photographs: Cover of Elle Bulgaria, November 2009

 

Taylor Swift

Taylor Swift

Country cutie Taylor goes straight to sizzling hot whenever she shows off her figure.

Image: Taylor Swift
Photographs: Twitter.com

 

AnnaLynne McCord

AnnaLynne McCord

The 23-year-old star of 90210 is a slimline siren.

Image: AnnaLynne McCord
Photographs: Cover of Shape Magazine, March 2010

 

Ashley Greene

Ashley Greene

Twilight's Ashley is 24 and she's more vamp than vampire!

Image: Ashley Greene
Photographs: Cover of Women's Health Magazine, July 2010

 

Kristen Stewart

Kristen Stewart

And rounding off the list is Ashley's co-star Kristen, 20 -- no wonder she's captured hunk Pattinson's heart!

Image: Kristen Stewart
Photographs: Cover of Elle Belgium, August 2010